lastID = -289123
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:30:11 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:30:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 05:42:04 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:42:03 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market

To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market

To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market
Abstract
The combined efforts of this evaluation study establish the need and advantages of attaining Class A versus Class B level biosolids treatment. This paper is prepared with utilities in mind that are currently attempting to work through this dilemma, with specific emphasis on the cost to benefit of achieving Class A biosolid product for small to medium sized utilities. This paper will focus on the following three considerations of Class A versus B product:Benefits of the higher level of treatment and improved qualities and characteristics,Regulatory implications including the advantages and pitfalls, andMarketability advantages in “recycling”.This study evaluated the improved qualities and characteristics of the Class A residual product. Biosolids data from two (2) treatment facilities within the same community were compared (and will be further analyzed until the completion of this study through August2002). The second important issue relative to selection of Class A or B biosolids treatment is the current regulatory environment. The current regulatory environment has resulted in a less than clear picture for many utilities for biosolids management planning, including the potential to either severely restrict or prevent the beneficial recycling of biosolids products. Recent implications toward biosolids by a number of sources, some unfounded, have resulted in additional independent evaluations of the regulations and practices relevant to biosolids. Finally, this paper will address the current marketability advantages of the Class A versus Class B biosolid. In reviewing the most common disposition methods for Class B biosolid product generators, the greater majority are limited to utilizing land application, whereas, the Class A or AA biosolid product generators have a greater opportunity for beneficial recycling.The findings of this paper indicate that the wastewater industry should strongly consider biosolids treatment to Class A levels, if at all possible. The regulatory climate at federal, state, and county levels is a trend of necessitating the higher level of treatment. Depending on the Class A process selected, the cost to achieve Class A level treatment may not be significantly more than the Class B level treatment. The marketability of the Class A biosolid product opens many doors to the utility, including use by the general public. In conclusion, the uncertainty of the current regulatory climate relative to biosolids, along with the increased flexibility and beneficial uses of the Class A product, make the Class A biosolid option a likely part of your utilities future.
The combined efforts of this evaluation study establish the need and advantages of attaining Class A versus Class B level biosolids treatment. This paper is prepared with utilities in mind that are currently attempting to work through this dilemma, with specific emphasis on the cost to benefit of achieving Class A biosolid product for small to medium sized utilities. This paper will focus on the...
Author(s)
Brian M. StahlRaynetta Curry GrantMatt R. Hixson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4 - Residuals and Biosolids Management Symposium: Biosolids Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:17L.373;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702784248926
Volume / Issue2002 / 17
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)373 - 383
Copyright2002
Word count416

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289123
Get access
-289123
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market
Abstract
The combined efforts of this evaluation study establish the need and advantages of attaining Class A versus Class B level biosolids treatment. This paper is prepared with utilities in mind that are currently attempting to work through this dilemma, with specific emphasis on the cost to benefit of achieving Class A biosolid product for small to medium sized utilities. This paper will focus on the following three considerations of Class A versus B product:Benefits of the higher level of treatment and improved qualities and characteristics,Regulatory implications including the advantages and pitfalls, andMarketability advantages in “recycling”.This study evaluated the improved qualities and characteristics of the Class A residual product. Biosolids data from two (2) treatment facilities within the same community were compared (and will be further analyzed until the completion of this study through August2002). The second important issue relative to selection of Class A or B biosolids treatment is the current regulatory environment. The current regulatory environment has resulted in a less than clear picture for many utilities for biosolids management planning, including the potential to either severely restrict or prevent the beneficial recycling of biosolids products. Recent implications toward biosolids by a number of sources, some unfounded, have resulted in additional independent evaluations of the regulations and practices relevant to biosolids. Finally, this paper will address the current marketability advantages of the Class A versus Class B biosolid. In reviewing the most common disposition methods for Class B biosolid product generators, the greater majority are limited to utilizing land application, whereas, the Class A or AA biosolid product generators have a greater opportunity for beneficial recycling.The findings of this paper indicate that the wastewater industry should strongly consider biosolids treatment to Class A levels, if at all possible. The regulatory climate at federal, state, and county levels is a trend of necessitating the higher level of treatment. Depending on the Class A process selected, the cost to achieve Class A level treatment may not be significantly more than the Class B level treatment. The marketability of the Class A biosolid product opens many doors to the utility, including use by the general public. In conclusion, the uncertainty of the current regulatory climate relative to biosolids, along with the increased flexibility and beneficial uses of the Class A product, make the Class A biosolid option a likely part of your utilities future.
The combined efforts of this evaluation study establish the need and advantages of attaining Class A versus Class B level biosolids treatment. This paper is prepared with utilities in mind that are currently attempting to work through this dilemma, with specific emphasis on the cost to benefit of achieving Class A biosolid product for small to medium sized utilities. This paper will focus on the...
Author(s)
Brian M. StahlRaynetta Curry GrantMatt R. Hixson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4 - Residuals and Biosolids Management Symposium: Biosolids Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:17L.373;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702784248926
Volume / Issue2002 / 17
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)373 - 383
Copyright2002
Word count416

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Brian M. Stahl# Raynetta Curry Grant# Matt R. Hixson. To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289123CITANCHOR>.
Brian M. Stahl# Raynetta Curry Grant# Matt R. Hixson. To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289123CITANCHOR.
Brian M. Stahl# Raynetta Curry Grant# Matt R. Hixson
To “B” or Not to B (Class A), that is the Question: A Utility's Quest to Sustain a Biosolids Market
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289123CITANCHOR