lastID = -289701
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 16:39:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 16:39:16 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:04:40 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 00:52:29 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 00:52:28 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY

LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY

LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY
Abstract
The requirements of various federal, state, and local regulations for storm water treatment have created an increased demand for storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as structural Best Management Practices (BMPs). As a result, a number of new products have come onto the market. Many of these companies make claims about performance efficiencies that are not verified through independent testing. A problem for regulators and end users is determining the performance characteristics and treatment capabilities of these devices without prior testing. Reliable performance data are often not available, and since many of these devices are new, they lack information generated from long-term field-testing. Evaluating the effectiveness of treatment devices that may be used in applications for meeting potential BMP or Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements is an essential step in meeting regulatory requirements.The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has implemented the Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program to accelerate marketplace acceptance of commercially available innovative technical solutions to problems that threaten human health or the environment. A primary goal of the ETV program is to disseminate high quality data to prospective purchasers of treatment devices. NSF International (NSF, formerly the National Sanitation Foundation) has partnered with the USEPA to develop programs for verification of a variety of water treatment technologies. Testing protocols and plans are developed with the input of stakeholders, which can include technology vendors, regulators, the scientific and technical community, and/or users of a particular technology. Verification testing is conducted by Testing Organizations with demonstrated technical expertise. Final Verification Reports are made publicly available on the USEPA's website.NSF is currently performing testing of an in-drain treatment BMP device under the auspices of the Source Water Protection Program, which is part of ETV's Water Quality Protection (WQP) Center. The BMP to be verified is the Hydro-Kleen™ Filtration System, which is designed for use with storm water catch basins and area drains to trap hydrocarbons, metals, sediments, and other storm water and surface runoff constituents. Testing consists of challenging the device with wastewater spiked with constituents the device claims to treat, as well as constituents that could have an effect on the devices treatment capabilities. Collecting and analyzing samples of influent will verify the contaminant removal efficiency of the device and effluent flows. This testing is conducted in a controlled indoor laboratory, using a synthesized wastewater formulated specifically for ETV verification testing.Testing in a laboratory environment offers a significant number of advantages over field-testing. ETV testing not only verifies the effectiveness of the device, but also validates the effectiveness of the testing procedures outlined in the verification protocol and test plan. By completing this ETV testing, NSF anticipates verifying the efficacy of the device will also validate the use of laboratory testing procedures as a method of obtaining reliable data with “real world” implications and uses.
The requirements of various federal, state, and local regulations for storm water treatment have created an increased demand for storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as structural Best Management Practices (BMPs). As a result, a number of new products have come onto the market. Many of these companies make claims about performance efficiencies that are not verified through...
Author(s)
Patrick DavisonThomas StevensRaymond FrederickDavid A. Woelkers
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2 BMP Effectiveness
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:8L.189;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785071750
Volume / Issue2002 / 8
Content sourceTMDLS Conference
First / last page(s)189 - 206
Copyright2002
Word count479

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289701
Get access
-289701
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY
Abstract
The requirements of various federal, state, and local regulations for storm water treatment have created an increased demand for storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as structural Best Management Practices (BMPs). As a result, a number of new products have come onto the market. Many of these companies make claims about performance efficiencies that are not verified through independent testing. A problem for regulators and end users is determining the performance characteristics and treatment capabilities of these devices without prior testing. Reliable performance data are often not available, and since many of these devices are new, they lack information generated from long-term field-testing. Evaluating the effectiveness of treatment devices that may be used in applications for meeting potential BMP or Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements is an essential step in meeting regulatory requirements.The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has implemented the Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program to accelerate marketplace acceptance of commercially available innovative technical solutions to problems that threaten human health or the environment. A primary goal of the ETV program is to disseminate high quality data to prospective purchasers of treatment devices. NSF International (NSF, formerly the National Sanitation Foundation) has partnered with the USEPA to develop programs for verification of a variety of water treatment technologies. Testing protocols and plans are developed with the input of stakeholders, which can include technology vendors, regulators, the scientific and technical community, and/or users of a particular technology. Verification testing is conducted by Testing Organizations with demonstrated technical expertise. Final Verification Reports are made publicly available on the USEPA's website.NSF is currently performing testing of an in-drain treatment BMP device under the auspices of the Source Water Protection Program, which is part of ETV's Water Quality Protection (WQP) Center. The BMP to be verified is the Hydro-Kleen™ Filtration System, which is designed for use with storm water catch basins and area drains to trap hydrocarbons, metals, sediments, and other storm water and surface runoff constituents. Testing consists of challenging the device with wastewater spiked with constituents the device claims to treat, as well as constituents that could have an effect on the devices treatment capabilities. Collecting and analyzing samples of influent will verify the contaminant removal efficiency of the device and effluent flows. This testing is conducted in a controlled indoor laboratory, using a synthesized wastewater formulated specifically for ETV verification testing.Testing in a laboratory environment offers a significant number of advantages over field-testing. ETV testing not only verifies the effectiveness of the device, but also validates the effectiveness of the testing procedures outlined in the verification protocol and test plan. By completing this ETV testing, NSF anticipates verifying the efficacy of the device will also validate the use of laboratory testing procedures as a method of obtaining reliable data with “real world” implications and uses.
The requirements of various federal, state, and local regulations for storm water treatment have created an increased demand for storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as structural Best Management Practices (BMPs). As a result, a number of new products have come onto the market. Many of these companies make claims about performance efficiencies that are not verified through...
Author(s)
Patrick DavisonThomas StevensRaymond FrederickDavid A. Woelkers
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2 BMP Effectiveness
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:8L.189;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785071750
Volume / Issue2002 / 8
Content sourceTMDLS Conference
First / last page(s)189 - 206
Copyright2002
Word count479

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Patrick Davison# Thomas Stevens# Raymond Frederick# David A. Woelkers. LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289701CITANCHOR>.
Patrick Davison# Thomas Stevens# Raymond Frederick# David A. Woelkers. LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289701CITANCHOR.
Patrick Davison# Thomas Stevens# Raymond Frederick# David A. Woelkers
LABORATORY VERIFICATION OF HYDROCARBON CONTROL BMPs: AN ETV CASE STUDY
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289701CITANCHOR