lastID = -290063
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:49:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:49:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:52:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 05:48:34 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:48:33 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience

Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience

Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience
Abstract
The Parkway Plant located in Laurel, Maryland was designed to handle mostly domestic wastewater from the area. It is owned and operated by the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission – WSSC. Typical plant layout is shown in Figure I. The Parkway Wastewater Treatment Plant, a 7.5 mgd design capacity Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) system, presently processing 6.0 million gallons of wastewater daily, has been effectively treating water plant sludges for twenty-four years.The Patuxent Water Filtration Plant, in Laurel, Maryland, is also owned and operated by the WSSC providing quality drinking water to its customers in the Montgomery and Prince George County areas. Prior to October 1, 1975, the water plants residuals were discharged into the Walker Branch of the Patuxent River. The Maryland Water Resources Administration indicated that the issuance of an NPDES Permit would restrict discharge of this residual to the stream. In order to comply with this requirement, WSSC undertook a study to determine the best method of disposal. One option was to discharge the residual to the Parkway Wastewater Treatment Plant for treatment. In anticipation of this requirement, laboratory investigations were begun in November of 1974 to determine the effects of the water plant's alum residual on the Parkway WWTP. The preliminary study showed that this residual would significantly increase the suspended solids in the primary clarifier effluent. This situation does not necessarily mean that the effect will be detrimental to the entire treatment process; however, at that time, there was some suspicion that it might be. Therefore, further and more comprehensive studies were needed to establish what effect the Patuxent residual would cause at Parkway.The Maryland Water Resources Administration then issued an NPDES permit for the water plant which directed that sludge discharges into the Walker Branch be discontinued after October l, 1975. Construction was undertaken to tie in the discharge line from the residual holding basins to a sanitary sewer leading to the Parkway Plant. This was found to be the most economical and expedient method of complying with the discharge permit requirements. The plant was to discharge its alum sludge to the sewer and allow it to mix with the wastewater in the line. The time of concentration from the water plant to the wastewater plant was determined at that time to be approximately 5 hours. Currently that time is estimated to be 3 to 4 hours with increases in daily flows. Upon reaching Parkway, the residuals would be handled and removed in the typical operating scheme of the plant. Since most of the residuals coming from the water plant would be composed of inorganics, they should be captured in the primaries. They would then be sent to the thickeners along with the primary and waste activated sludge for further processing. It was anticipated that 75,000 gallons per day of alum sludge with 6,900 pounds of dry solids – approximately one percent – would have to be treated. No additional modifications to the Parkway facility were planned. This was slightly off the mark. Check this data.
The Parkway Plant located in Laurel, Maryland was designed to handle mostly domestic wastewater from the area. It is owned and operated by the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission – WSSC. Typical plant layout is shown in Figure I. The Parkway Wastewater Treatment Plant, a 7.5 mgd design capacity Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) system, presently processing 6.0 million gallons of...
Author(s)
Michael R. RumkeDennis P. GearyJoel L. ThompsonJay Price
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4 Regional Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:1L.236;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784292863
Volume / Issue2003 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)236 - 244
Copyright2003
Word count511

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-290063
Get access
-290063
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience
Abstract
The Parkway Plant located in Laurel, Maryland was designed to handle mostly domestic wastewater from the area. It is owned and operated by the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission – WSSC. Typical plant layout is shown in Figure I. The Parkway Wastewater Treatment Plant, a 7.5 mgd design capacity Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) system, presently processing 6.0 million gallons of wastewater daily, has been effectively treating water plant sludges for twenty-four years.The Patuxent Water Filtration Plant, in Laurel, Maryland, is also owned and operated by the WSSC providing quality drinking water to its customers in the Montgomery and Prince George County areas. Prior to October 1, 1975, the water plants residuals were discharged into the Walker Branch of the Patuxent River. The Maryland Water Resources Administration indicated that the issuance of an NPDES Permit would restrict discharge of this residual to the stream. In order to comply with this requirement, WSSC undertook a study to determine the best method of disposal. One option was to discharge the residual to the Parkway Wastewater Treatment Plant for treatment. In anticipation of this requirement, laboratory investigations were begun in November of 1974 to determine the effects of the water plant's alum residual on the Parkway WWTP. The preliminary study showed that this residual would significantly increase the suspended solids in the primary clarifier effluent. This situation does not necessarily mean that the effect will be detrimental to the entire treatment process; however, at that time, there was some suspicion that it might be. Therefore, further and more comprehensive studies were needed to establish what effect the Patuxent residual would cause at Parkway.The Maryland Water Resources Administration then issued an NPDES permit for the water plant which directed that sludge discharges into the Walker Branch be discontinued after October l, 1975. Construction was undertaken to tie in the discharge line from the residual holding basins to a sanitary sewer leading to the Parkway Plant. This was found to be the most economical and expedient method of complying with the discharge permit requirements. The plant was to discharge its alum sludge to the sewer and allow it to mix with the wastewater in the line. The time of concentration from the water plant to the wastewater plant was determined at that time to be approximately 5 hours. Currently that time is estimated to be 3 to 4 hours with increases in daily flows. Upon reaching Parkway, the residuals would be handled and removed in the typical operating scheme of the plant. Since most of the residuals coming from the water plant would be composed of inorganics, they should be captured in the primaries. They would then be sent to the thickeners along with the primary and waste activated sludge for further processing. It was anticipated that 75,000 gallons per day of alum sludge with 6,900 pounds of dry solids – approximately one percent – would have to be treated. No additional modifications to the Parkway facility were planned. This was slightly off the mark. Check this data.
The Parkway Plant located in Laurel, Maryland was designed to handle mostly domestic wastewater from the area. It is owned and operated by the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission – WSSC. Typical plant layout is shown in Figure I. The Parkway Wastewater Treatment Plant, a 7.5 mgd design capacity Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) system, presently processing 6.0 million gallons of...
Author(s)
Michael R. RumkeDennis P. GearyJoel L. ThompsonJay Price
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4 Regional Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:1L.236;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784292863
Volume / Issue2003 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)236 - 244
Copyright2003
Word count511

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Michael R. Rumke# Dennis P. Geary# Joel L. Thompson# Jay Price. Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 13 Dec. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-290063CITANCHOR>.
Michael R. Rumke# Dennis P. Geary# Joel L. Thompson# Jay Price. Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed December 13, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290063CITANCHOR.
Michael R. Rumke# Dennis P. Geary# Joel L. Thompson# Jay Price
Treating Water Plant Residuals at a Wastewater Treatment Plant – The WSSC Experience
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
December 13, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290063CITANCHOR