lastID = -290463
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 19:49:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 19:49:51 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 04:14:57 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 04:14:56 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION

SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION

SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION
Abstract
The primary objective of this experiment was to assess the impact of different retention times in a thermophilic reactor on hydrolysis and acidification of sludge. The secondary goal of this study was to provide a comparison between various anaerobic digestion processes and their effect on the stabilization of sludge and pathogen reduction. Three lab scale anaerobic digestion systems were assembled. The main system – two-phase anaerobic digestion (TPAD) – consisted of two reactors: a thermophilic reactor followed by a mesophilic reactor. Two other systems included single phase thermophilic digester (TAD) and single phase mesophilic digester (MAD). Hydrolysis and acidification rates in the first reactor of the TPAD were the highest at 1 d solids residence time (SRT) and the lowest at 5 d SRT. It was found that the two processes increased exponentially with the decrease of SRT. Hydrolysis was a faster occurring reaction than acidification. Therefore, at short retention times acidification could be the limiting step in the first stage reactor of the TPAD. Acidification index, AI, was used as an optimization parameter for the retention time in the first reactor in TPAD. No significant difference in VS destruction between digestion systems was observed. Increase in loading rates resulted in higher methane production but it also resulted in less methane produced per gram VS destroyed. The overall efficiency of the TPAD was offset by very low methane production in the first reactor and no significant difference in the overall methane production between digestion systems was observed. The single thermophilic reactor and the TPAD system achieved Class A biosolids standards with respect to fecal coliforms and spiked Ascaris suum eggs inactivation. The single MAD often failed to produce Class B biosolids using fecal coliforms as an indicator organism. It also showed very low level of destruction of Ascaris eggs. Clostridium perfringens destruction was very low for all systems: 1-log reduction was not achieved. Apparent regrowth of these organisms was observed in mesophilic conditions. There were no overt benefits of higher hydrolysis rates in the first reactor of the TPAD system in terms of higher VS destruction and/or higher methane production when compared to the single digesters. The two-stage anaerobic digestion system was the least sensitive to changes in loading rates and retention times and exhibited the least variability in capillary suction time (CST).
The primary objective of this experiment was to assess the impact of different retention times in a thermophilic reactor on hydrolysis and acidification of sludge. The secondary goal of this study was to provide a comparison between various anaerobic digestion processes and their effect on the stabilization of sludge and pathogen reduction. Three lab scale anaerobic digestion systems were...
Author(s)
B. PuchajdaJ. Oleszkiewicz
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 63 Residuals and Biosolids Management: Advanced Digestion and Innovative Processes Part I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:6L.284;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784641801
Volume / Issue2003 / 6
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)284 - 301
Copyright2003
Word count392

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-290463
Get access
-290463
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION
Abstract
The primary objective of this experiment was to assess the impact of different retention times in a thermophilic reactor on hydrolysis and acidification of sludge. The secondary goal of this study was to provide a comparison between various anaerobic digestion processes and their effect on the stabilization of sludge and pathogen reduction. Three lab scale anaerobic digestion systems were assembled. The main system – two-phase anaerobic digestion (TPAD) – consisted of two reactors: a thermophilic reactor followed by a mesophilic reactor. Two other systems included single phase thermophilic digester (TAD) and single phase mesophilic digester (MAD). Hydrolysis and acidification rates in the first reactor of the TPAD were the highest at 1 d solids residence time (SRT) and the lowest at 5 d SRT. It was found that the two processes increased exponentially with the decrease of SRT. Hydrolysis was a faster occurring reaction than acidification. Therefore, at short retention times acidification could be the limiting step in the first stage reactor of the TPAD. Acidification index, AI, was used as an optimization parameter for the retention time in the first reactor in TPAD. No significant difference in VS destruction between digestion systems was observed. Increase in loading rates resulted in higher methane production but it also resulted in less methane produced per gram VS destroyed. The overall efficiency of the TPAD was offset by very low methane production in the first reactor and no significant difference in the overall methane production between digestion systems was observed. The single thermophilic reactor and the TPAD system achieved Class A biosolids standards with respect to fecal coliforms and spiked Ascaris suum eggs inactivation. The single MAD often failed to produce Class B biosolids using fecal coliforms as an indicator organism. It also showed very low level of destruction of Ascaris eggs. Clostridium perfringens destruction was very low for all systems: 1-log reduction was not achieved. Apparent regrowth of these organisms was observed in mesophilic conditions. There were no overt benefits of higher hydrolysis rates in the first reactor of the TPAD system in terms of higher VS destruction and/or higher methane production when compared to the single digesters. The two-stage anaerobic digestion system was the least sensitive to changes in loading rates and retention times and exhibited the least variability in capillary suction time (CST).
The primary objective of this experiment was to assess the impact of different retention times in a thermophilic reactor on hydrolysis and acidification of sludge. The secondary goal of this study was to provide a comparison between various anaerobic digestion processes and their effect on the stabilization of sludge and pathogen reduction. Three lab scale anaerobic digestion systems were...
Author(s)
B. PuchajdaJ. Oleszkiewicz
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 63 Residuals and Biosolids Management: Advanced Digestion and Innovative Processes Part I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:6L.284;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784641801
Volume / Issue2003 / 6
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)284 - 301
Copyright2003
Word count392

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
B. Puchajda# J. Oleszkiewicz. SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 8 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-290463CITANCHOR>.
B. Puchajda# J. Oleszkiewicz. SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 8, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290463CITANCHOR.
B. Puchajda# J. Oleszkiewicz
SINGLE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: HYDROLYSIS, ACIDIFICATION AND PATHOGEN INACTIVATION
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 8, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290463CITANCHOR