lastID = -291086
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-01 03:42:40 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 03:42:39 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS

REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS

REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate factors affecting the rejection of emerging trace organics by a variety of commercial reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), and ultra-low pressure RO membranes during laboratory-scale experiments. Findings of this study indicated that rejection of negatively charged organics was driven by a combination of steric and electrostatic exclusion, which was independent of feed water recovery but affected by the presence of effluent organic matter (EfOM). Feed water recovery or EfOM did not affect the rejection of hydrophilic non-ionic solutes and removal was only driven by steric exclusion. Hydrophobic non-ionic compounds exhibited a high initial rejection due to hydrophobic/hydrophobic interactions and steric exclusion but rejection decreased significantly after 5 hours of operation due to partitioning of solutes through the membrane. Findings of this study imply that ULPRO and NF membranes, operated at lower feed pressure, perform similar to conventional RO membranes in removing trace organics of interest.
This study aimed to investigate factors affecting the rejection of emerging trace organics by a variety of commercial reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), and ultra-low pressure RO membranes during laboratory-scale experiments. Findings of this study indicated that rejection of negatively charged organics was driven by a combination of steric and electrostatic exclusion, which was...
Author(s)
Jörg E. DrewesPei XuChristopher BellonaGary AmyTae-Uk KimMark AdamThomas Heberer
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 1: AEESP Lecture and Fate, Transport and Treatment of Emerging Micro-Pollutants
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:16L.77;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784147548
Volume / Issue2004 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)77 - 96
Copyright2004
Word count160

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291086
Get access
-291086
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate factors affecting the rejection of emerging trace organics by a variety of commercial reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), and ultra-low pressure RO membranes during laboratory-scale experiments. Findings of this study indicated that rejection of negatively charged organics was driven by a combination of steric and electrostatic exclusion, which was independent of feed water recovery but affected by the presence of effluent organic matter (EfOM). Feed water recovery or EfOM did not affect the rejection of hydrophilic non-ionic solutes and removal was only driven by steric exclusion. Hydrophobic non-ionic compounds exhibited a high initial rejection due to hydrophobic/hydrophobic interactions and steric exclusion but rejection decreased significantly after 5 hours of operation due to partitioning of solutes through the membrane. Findings of this study imply that ULPRO and NF membranes, operated at lower feed pressure, perform similar to conventional RO membranes in removing trace organics of interest.
This study aimed to investigate factors affecting the rejection of emerging trace organics by a variety of commercial reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), and ultra-low pressure RO membranes during laboratory-scale experiments. Findings of this study indicated that rejection of negatively charged organics was driven by a combination of steric and electrostatic exclusion, which was...
Author(s)
Jörg E. DrewesPei XuChristopher BellonaGary AmyTae-Uk KimMark AdamThomas Heberer
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 1: AEESP Lecture and Fate, Transport and Treatment of Emerging Micro-Pollutants
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:16L.77;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784147548
Volume / Issue2004 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)77 - 96
Copyright2004
Word count160

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Jörg E. Drewes# Pei Xu# Christopher Bellona# Gary Amy# Tae-Uk Kim# Mark Adam# Thomas Heberer. REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 24 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291086CITANCHOR>.
Jörg E. Drewes# Pei Xu# Christopher Bellona# Gary Amy# Tae-Uk Kim# Mark Adam# Thomas Heberer. REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 24, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291086CITANCHOR.
Jörg E. Drewes# Pei Xu# Christopher Bellona# Gary Amy# Tae-Uk Kim# Mark Adam# Thomas Heberer
REJECTION OF EMERGING ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS IN NANOFILTRATION/REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE APPLICATIONS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 24, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291086CITANCHOR