lastID = -291309
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-06-14 20:29:26 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-06-14 20:29:25 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:05:19 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:05:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 23:33:08 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:33:07 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:33:06 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range

GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range

GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range
Abstract
Hydrogen sulfide is often mentioned as equal to total odor at publicly owned treatment works POTWs. Hydrogen sulfide is actually only one of a number of reduced sulfur compounds that are prevalent at POTWs and can cause an adverse olfactory reaction. Reduced sulfur compounds are often the source of many odor complaints from POTWs due to their low odor thresholds and their persistence.It is often desirable to know the quantity of these compounds to estimate off-site impacts and to determine odor control design parameters. Unfortunately, the human nose is significantly better at detecting reduced sulfur compounds than either of the primary toxic organic methods used today (TO-14A, or TO-15). Another method, ASTM method D-5504 has been employed that uses a sulfur chemiluminescence detector to reduce the reporting limit for reduced sulfur compounds. This test method, although effective, requires a significant additional laboratory expense that serves only one function and therefore makes it cost prohibitive for many laboratories to employ. In contrast, there are a number of commercial laboratories that have the capability to conduct TO- 14A and TO-15 analysis.This paper discusses an analytical procedure to better examine sulfide and thiol (mercaptan) compounds with modifications to EPA Method TO-15. A sensitivity study was conducted in both the full scan and selective ion-monitoring (SIM) mode to examine if there is any increase in sensitivity for these compounds via SIM. Reporting limits will be documented utilizing both approaches.Reactivity of reduced sulfur compounds has been a concern in all types of sampling media and has been evaluated before. In many of the earlier studies the reactivity of the samples was linked to variability in the Summa canister deactivation process or uncoated valves and fittings. This paper reexamines canister and Tedlar® bag hold times based on the recent advances in stainless steel canister coating technology, i.e. fused silica lining (FSL). An evaluation of canister and Tedlar® bag hold time was conducted. Different modifications to the canister deactivation process were also evaluated and observed effects on hold time were documented.
Hydrogen sulfide is often mentioned as equal to total odor at publicly owned treatment works POTWs. Hydrogen sulfide is actually only one of a number of reduced sulfur compounds that are prevalent at POTWs and can cause an adverse olfactory reaction. Reduced sulfur compounds are often the source of many odor complaints from POTWs due to their low odor thresholds and their persistence.It is often...
Author(s)
Andy RezendesJames OcchialiniMichael Lannan
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 11: Methods for Sampling, Measuring, and Analyzing Emissions II
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:3L.824;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784327269
Volume / Issue2004 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)824 - 839
Copyright2004
Word count344

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291309
Get access
-291309
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range
Abstract
Hydrogen sulfide is often mentioned as equal to total odor at publicly owned treatment works POTWs. Hydrogen sulfide is actually only one of a number of reduced sulfur compounds that are prevalent at POTWs and can cause an adverse olfactory reaction. Reduced sulfur compounds are often the source of many odor complaints from POTWs due to their low odor thresholds and their persistence.It is often desirable to know the quantity of these compounds to estimate off-site impacts and to determine odor control design parameters. Unfortunately, the human nose is significantly better at detecting reduced sulfur compounds than either of the primary toxic organic methods used today (TO-14A, or TO-15). Another method, ASTM method D-5504 has been employed that uses a sulfur chemiluminescence detector to reduce the reporting limit for reduced sulfur compounds. This test method, although effective, requires a significant additional laboratory expense that serves only one function and therefore makes it cost prohibitive for many laboratories to employ. In contrast, there are a number of commercial laboratories that have the capability to conduct TO- 14A and TO-15 analysis.This paper discusses an analytical procedure to better examine sulfide and thiol (mercaptan) compounds with modifications to EPA Method TO-15. A sensitivity study was conducted in both the full scan and selective ion-monitoring (SIM) mode to examine if there is any increase in sensitivity for these compounds via SIM. Reporting limits will be documented utilizing both approaches.Reactivity of reduced sulfur compounds has been a concern in all types of sampling media and has been evaluated before. In many of the earlier studies the reactivity of the samples was linked to variability in the Summa canister deactivation process or uncoated valves and fittings. This paper reexamines canister and Tedlar® bag hold times based on the recent advances in stainless steel canister coating technology, i.e. fused silica lining (FSL). An evaluation of canister and Tedlar® bag hold time was conducted. Different modifications to the canister deactivation process were also evaluated and observed effects on hold time were documented.
Hydrogen sulfide is often mentioned as equal to total odor at publicly owned treatment works POTWs. Hydrogen sulfide is actually only one of a number of reduced sulfur compounds that are prevalent at POTWs and can cause an adverse olfactory reaction. Reduced sulfur compounds are often the source of many odor complaints from POTWs due to their low odor thresholds and their persistence.It is often...
Author(s)
Andy RezendesJames OcchialiniMichael Lannan
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 11: Methods for Sampling, Measuring, and Analyzing Emissions II
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:3L.824;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784327269
Volume / Issue2004 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)824 - 839
Copyright2004
Word count344

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Andy Rezendes# James Occhialini# Michael Lannan. GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291309CITANCHOR>.
Andy Rezendes# James Occhialini# Michael Lannan. GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291309CITANCHOR.
Andy Rezendes# James Occhialini# Michael Lannan
GOT SULFUR? Analytical Methods in the Odor Threshold Range
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291309CITANCHOR