lastID = -291675
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 18:36:51 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 18:36:50 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 03:27:26 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 03:27:25 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 03:27:24 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II

QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II

QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II
Abstract
New York State and Onondaga County have developed a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for phosphorus entering Onondaga Lake. Agricultural runoff was identified as a main source of phosphorus within the watershed.During a Phase I project, suites of best management practices (BMPs) were implemented on farms that resulted in reductions in phosphorus and nitrogen loads greater than 50%. During this Phase II project, individual agricultural BMPs were implemented and evaluated for performance.A structural BMP known as a bark filter system was implemented at the Bloom farm. The bark filter system intercepts and treats milk parlor wastewater through a settling tank and wood chip disposal bed before it reaches the receiving water. The settling tank reduced solids and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) concentration by more than 50%, but did not reduce phosphorus or nitrogen concentrations. A significant decrease in BOD, phosphorus and nitrogen was observed in the bark filter effluent, which was likely the result of physical removal of pollutants as the wastewater being passed through the wood chips and dilution with groundwater.A soil management BMP known as a nutrient management plan was implemented at the Rohe farm. The nutrient management plan included operational practices pertaining to corn field management, such as modifying the time and amount of manure application. Runoff from a field with a nutrient management plan (i.e., test plot) was compared to runoff from a field that was not managed according to a nutrient plan (i.e., control plot). Runoff from the test plot had significantly lower concentrations of phosphorus and nitrogen than runoff from the control plot during the spring runoff period, but the runoff from the plots had similar concentrations during the remainder of the year. Concentrations of phosphorus and nitrogen in the control plot runoff were high in the spring because of the heavy manure loads it received throughout the winter. The test plot received some manure during the winter, but it was a light application compared to the control plot. The control plot received higher fertilizer application rates than the test plot after the spring runoff period, but no significant difference in phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations were observed throughout the summer and autumn.The Phase I and Phase II data show that agricultural BMPs reduce the load of nutrients reaching the receiving waters in the Onondaga Lake watershed. It was recommended that the final stage of this project include modeling to extrapolate the results of Phase I and II to the entire watershed to help develop a watershed plan for meeting the TMDL.
New York State and Onondaga County have developed a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for phosphorus entering Onondaga Lake. Agricultural runoff was identified as a main source of phosphorus within the watershed.During a Phase I project, suites of best management practices (BMPs) were implemented on farms that resulted in reductions in phosphorus and nitrogen loads greater than 50%. During this...
Author(s)
John J. LaGorgaPeter E. MoffaDaniel G. GilbertJohn G. Ferrante
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 71: Watershed Nutrient Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:9L.46;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784132463
Volume / Issue2004 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)46 - 53
Copyright2004
Word count429

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291675
Get access
-291675
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II
Abstract
New York State and Onondaga County have developed a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for phosphorus entering Onondaga Lake. Agricultural runoff was identified as a main source of phosphorus within the watershed.During a Phase I project, suites of best management practices (BMPs) were implemented on farms that resulted in reductions in phosphorus and nitrogen loads greater than 50%. During this Phase II project, individual agricultural BMPs were implemented and evaluated for performance.A structural BMP known as a bark filter system was implemented at the Bloom farm. The bark filter system intercepts and treats milk parlor wastewater through a settling tank and wood chip disposal bed before it reaches the receiving water. The settling tank reduced solids and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) concentration by more than 50%, but did not reduce phosphorus or nitrogen concentrations. A significant decrease in BOD, phosphorus and nitrogen was observed in the bark filter effluent, which was likely the result of physical removal of pollutants as the wastewater being passed through the wood chips and dilution with groundwater.A soil management BMP known as a nutrient management plan was implemented at the Rohe farm. The nutrient management plan included operational practices pertaining to corn field management, such as modifying the time and amount of manure application. Runoff from a field with a nutrient management plan (i.e., test plot) was compared to runoff from a field that was not managed according to a nutrient plan (i.e., control plot). Runoff from the test plot had significantly lower concentrations of phosphorus and nitrogen than runoff from the control plot during the spring runoff period, but the runoff from the plots had similar concentrations during the remainder of the year. Concentrations of phosphorus and nitrogen in the control plot runoff were high in the spring because of the heavy manure loads it received throughout the winter. The test plot received some manure during the winter, but it was a light application compared to the control plot. The control plot received higher fertilizer application rates than the test plot after the spring runoff period, but no significant difference in phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations were observed throughout the summer and autumn.The Phase I and Phase II data show that agricultural BMPs reduce the load of nutrients reaching the receiving waters in the Onondaga Lake watershed. It was recommended that the final stage of this project include modeling to extrapolate the results of Phase I and II to the entire watershed to help develop a watershed plan for meeting the TMDL.
New York State and Onondaga County have developed a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for phosphorus entering Onondaga Lake. Agricultural runoff was identified as a main source of phosphorus within the watershed.During a Phase I project, suites of best management practices (BMPs) were implemented on farms that resulted in reductions in phosphorus and nitrogen loads greater than 50%. During this...
Author(s)
John J. LaGorgaPeter E. MoffaDaniel G. GilbertJohn G. Ferrante
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 71: Watershed Nutrient Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:9L.46;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784132463
Volume / Issue2004 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)46 - 53
Copyright2004
Word count429

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
John J. LaGorga# Peter E. Moffa# Daniel G. Gilbert# John G. Ferrante. QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291675CITANCHOR>.
John J. LaGorga# Peter E. Moffa# Daniel G. Gilbert# John G. Ferrante. QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291675CITANCHOR.
John J. LaGorga# Peter E. Moffa# Daniel G. Gilbert# John G. Ferrante
QUANTIFYING AND REDUCING NUTRIENT RUNOFF FROM AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES - PHASE II
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291675CITANCHOR