lastID = -292246
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:37:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:37:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:48:09 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:48:08 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 03:49:12 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 03:49:11 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES

RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES

RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES
Abstract
Whenever two or three biosolids professionals gather, the conversation seems eventually to turn to the public's lack of understanding of biosolids and the reasonableness of land application. In Southern California, for example, a grand jury recently released a 16-page report entitled, “Does Anyone Want Orange County Sanitation District's 230,000 Tons of Biosolids?” The study recommended four specific actions Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) could take that, according to the National Biosolids Partnership (NBP) web site, “could bolster public tolerance of the District's biosolids management program.” The NBP said of the grand jury report:The purpose of the study was to review OCSD's existing biosolids management programs and long-range plans in light of recent developments to determine if modifications are warranted. The study also considered opportunities to enhance public acceptance of existing programs, which could extend the timeline for eventual conversion to more-viable options and postpone the inevitable expenditure of funds to develop alternatives for biosolids recycling (Orange County Grand Jury Issues Biosolids Recommendations to OCSD, 2005).Activities such as the Orange County grand jury's investigation of Orange County Sanitation District's biosolids management program point out the need for biosolids generators and those who advise them to be aware of the public's understanding and tolerance of biosolids and disposal practices. This is especially true of land application of Class B biosolids. For example, the Orange County grand jury report recognized OCSD as one of the leading publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) and the first in the United States to achieve certification of its Environmental Management System (EMS) for Biosolids. It also dwelled at length on the lack of public understanding of and tolerance for land application and recognized problems caused by persistent perceptions of risk to humans and nuisance issues. Despite OCSD's extensive and exemplary public outreach and involvement actions and the Orange County grand jury's apparent understanding of OCSD's environmentally responsible actions to manage its biosolids, the grand jury recommended that OCSD phase out Class B biosolids land application except in remote areas.The degree to which POTWs and biosolids contractors reach out to the public, listen to their concerns, and attempt to reach out to them to explain biosolids practices and involve the public in decision making is crucial in establishing public understanding of and tolerance for land application. This paper reports on a survey of biosolids professionals and their public communication and outreach practices.
Whenever two or three biosolids professionals gather, the conversation seems eventually to turn to the public's lack of understanding of biosolids and the reasonableness of land application. In Southern California, for example, a grand jury recently released a 16-page report entitled, “Does Anyone Want Orange County Sanitation District's 230,000 Tons of Biosolids?” The study...
Author(s)
Steve FrankMike Scharp
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: Public Education and Communication
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:2L.598;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783968321
Volume / Issue2005 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)598 - 613
Copyright2005
Word count403

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292246
Get access
-292246
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES
Abstract
Whenever two or three biosolids professionals gather, the conversation seems eventually to turn to the public's lack of understanding of biosolids and the reasonableness of land application. In Southern California, for example, a grand jury recently released a 16-page report entitled, “Does Anyone Want Orange County Sanitation District's 230,000 Tons of Biosolids?” The study recommended four specific actions Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) could take that, according to the National Biosolids Partnership (NBP) web site, “could bolster public tolerance of the District's biosolids management program.” The NBP said of the grand jury report:The purpose of the study was to review OCSD's existing biosolids management programs and long-range plans in light of recent developments to determine if modifications are warranted. The study also considered opportunities to enhance public acceptance of existing programs, which could extend the timeline for eventual conversion to more-viable options and postpone the inevitable expenditure of funds to develop alternatives for biosolids recycling (Orange County Grand Jury Issues Biosolids Recommendations to OCSD, 2005).Activities such as the Orange County grand jury's investigation of Orange County Sanitation District's biosolids management program point out the need for biosolids generators and those who advise them to be aware of the public's understanding and tolerance of biosolids and disposal practices. This is especially true of land application of Class B biosolids. For example, the Orange County grand jury report recognized OCSD as one of the leading publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) and the first in the United States to achieve certification of its Environmental Management System (EMS) for Biosolids. It also dwelled at length on the lack of public understanding of and tolerance for land application and recognized problems caused by persistent perceptions of risk to humans and nuisance issues. Despite OCSD's extensive and exemplary public outreach and involvement actions and the Orange County grand jury's apparent understanding of OCSD's environmentally responsible actions to manage its biosolids, the grand jury recommended that OCSD phase out Class B biosolids land application except in remote areas.The degree to which POTWs and biosolids contractors reach out to the public, listen to their concerns, and attempt to reach out to them to explain biosolids practices and involve the public in decision making is crucial in establishing public understanding of and tolerance for land application. This paper reports on a survey of biosolids professionals and their public communication and outreach practices.
Whenever two or three biosolids professionals gather, the conversation seems eventually to turn to the public's lack of understanding of biosolids and the reasonableness of land application. In Southern California, for example, a grand jury recently released a 16-page report entitled, “Does Anyone Want Orange County Sanitation District's 230,000 Tons of Biosolids?” The study...
Author(s)
Steve FrankMike Scharp
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: Public Education and Communication
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:2L.598;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783968321
Volume / Issue2005 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)598 - 613
Copyright2005
Word count403

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Steve Frank# Mike Scharp. RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 23 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292246CITANCHOR>.
Steve Frank# Mike Scharp. RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 23, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292246CITANCHOR.
Steve Frank# Mike Scharp
RESULTS OF A SURVEY ON BIOSOLIDS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE PRACTICES
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 23, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292246CITANCHOR