lastID = -292257
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:50:05 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:50:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:47:55 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 05:55:03 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:55:02 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS

TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS

TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS
Abstract
Class A biosolids processes are perceived to be more expensive than traditional Class B processes. This perception is not always true. The City of Three Rivers, Michigan chained together two Class A biosolids processes: a 2nd generation autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) and an indirectly heated batch dryer to lower construction and operating costs, provide more reliable operation and add process flexibility.The 2.75 mgd City of Three Rivers WWTP was beset by numerous problems, including organic overloading, septage receiving, failing anaerobic digesters and tremendous odor problems. Sludge drying was selected to replace anaerobic digestion, due to the small volume of end product and a potential local market for dried biosolids. Potential problems were odors, lack of redundant units and staffing for continuous dryer “campaigns”. Additional research and analysis indicated that biosolids stabilization before drying would allow the use of a smaller, much less expensive batch dryer and eliminate the need for redundant units. The most cost effective stabilization process in this “Dual A” concept was a 2nd generation ATAD. It emits no odorous reduced sulfur compounds, produces VS reduction in excess of 60% and could be placed in two existing sludge-holding tanks and a garage. The dryer is an indirectly-heated batch dryer that automatically loads and unloads, is much less expensive than other dryers and can be operated daily and shut down.The “Dual A” design produces three types of Class A biosolids: 1) liquid biosolids from the ATAD, 2) dewatered cake, and 3) dried biosolids. This flexibility eliminates the need for redundant dewatering and drying, reduces greatly the equipment, and operating costs.The process was put on-line on schedule and with a few problems noted in this paper. The ATAD feed flow has been greater than design and the feed solids far below the design value. Despite this, the ATAD has maintained thermophilic temperatures, provides almost 50% TS reduction and an easily dewatered sludge at a reasonable polymer dose. The ATAD has been trouble-free. The ATAD enables the plant to accept septage and generates 125,000/yr of added revenue. The dryer has continual small problems but operates at higher than anticipated thermal efficiency and produces a non-dusty, large particle size, dried biosolid.
Class A biosolids processes are perceived to be more expensive than traditional Class B processes. This perception is not always true. The City of Three Rivers, Michigan chained together two Class A biosolids processes: a 2nd generation autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) and an indirectly heated batch dryer to lower construction and operating costs, provide more reliable operation...
Author(s)
JAMES P. SCISSON
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12: 5 Ways to Class A
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:2L.732;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783967638
Volume / Issue2005 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)732 - 754
Copyright2005
Word count376

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292257
Get access
-292257
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS
Abstract
Class A biosolids processes are perceived to be more expensive than traditional Class B processes. This perception is not always true. The City of Three Rivers, Michigan chained together two Class A biosolids processes: a 2nd generation autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) and an indirectly heated batch dryer to lower construction and operating costs, provide more reliable operation and add process flexibility.The 2.75 mgd City of Three Rivers WWTP was beset by numerous problems, including organic overloading, septage receiving, failing anaerobic digesters and tremendous odor problems. Sludge drying was selected to replace anaerobic digestion, due to the small volume of end product and a potential local market for dried biosolids. Potential problems were odors, lack of redundant units and staffing for continuous dryer “campaigns”. Additional research and analysis indicated that biosolids stabilization before drying would allow the use of a smaller, much less expensive batch dryer and eliminate the need for redundant units. The most cost effective stabilization process in this “Dual A” concept was a 2nd generation ATAD. It emits no odorous reduced sulfur compounds, produces VS reduction in excess of 60% and could be placed in two existing sludge-holding tanks and a garage. The dryer is an indirectly-heated batch dryer that automatically loads and unloads, is much less expensive than other dryers and can be operated daily and shut down.The “Dual A” design produces three types of Class A biosolids: 1) liquid biosolids from the ATAD, 2) dewatered cake, and 3) dried biosolids. This flexibility eliminates the need for redundant dewatering and drying, reduces greatly the equipment, and operating costs.The process was put on-line on schedule and with a few problems noted in this paper. The ATAD feed flow has been greater than design and the feed solids far below the design value. Despite this, the ATAD has maintained thermophilic temperatures, provides almost 50% TS reduction and an easily dewatered sludge at a reasonable polymer dose. The ATAD has been trouble-free. The ATAD enables the plant to accept septage and generates 125,000/yr of added revenue. The dryer has continual small problems but operates at higher than anticipated thermal efficiency and produces a non-dusty, large particle size, dried biosolid.
Class A biosolids processes are perceived to be more expensive than traditional Class B processes. This perception is not always true. The City of Three Rivers, Michigan chained together two Class A biosolids processes: a 2nd generation autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) and an indirectly heated batch dryer to lower construction and operating costs, provide more reliable operation...
Author(s)
JAMES P. SCISSON
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12: 5 Ways to Class A
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:2L.732;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783967638
Volume / Issue2005 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)732 - 754
Copyright2005
Word count376

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
JAMES P. SCISSON. TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292257CITANCHOR>.
JAMES P. SCISSON. TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292257CITANCHOR.
JAMES P. SCISSON
TWO CLASS “A” PROCESSES THREE YEARS LATER: A LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF THE DUAL “A” PROCESS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292257CITANCHOR