lastID = -293112
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-06-10 10:06:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 15:04:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 15:04:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:45:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:55:52 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:55:51 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Abstract
The Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission's (WSSC) Prince George's County Biosolids Management Facilities Plan was produced in 1994. Since then, biosolids processing and disposal practices at the WSSC have remained relatively the same, despite the developments of numerous local and national issues in the biosolids industry. During this period, existing WSSC biosolids processing facilities have aged an additional 10 years, which makes most of the major equipment more than 15 years old, and some over 40 years old. Thus, significant investments in biosolids processing facilities are likely in the near future. It is predicted that in the year 2025, on average, approximately 58 DT of biosolids will be generated every day at all three plants.This paper summarizes a portion of a study that developed and evaluated different biosolids management alternatives for the three wastewater treatment plants in Prince George's County. Four basic biosolids management technologies and three sites combined to form thirteen specific management strategies. The management strategies included a variety of stabilization and disposal methods for the biosolids generated at the wastewater treatment plants that WSSC operates in Prince George's County. One of the options evaluated was to continue the existing Class B biosolids operations and determine its implications.The stabilization technologies considered were:

lLime/Heat Stabilization
Heat Drying/Pelletization
Incineration

The management strategies combined various forms of these technologies that ranged from building and operating a regional heat drying/pelletization facility at one of the three plants that treats all the biosolids generated at all plants, to building/operating three individual lime/heat stabilization at each plant.For each of the 13 management strategies, advantages/disadvantages were identified along with a present worth analysis that included both the capital and the operation and maintenance costs.Costs per DT biosolids generated were developed for each site under each management strategy for the following cost items:

Dewatering O&M
Stabilization O&M
Transportation
Disposal
Annualized Dewatering Capital Cost
Annualized Stabilization Capital Cost
The Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission's (WSSC) Prince George's County Biosolids Management Facilities Plan was produced in 1994. Since then, biosolids processing and disposal practices at the WSSC have remained relatively the same, despite the developments of numerous local and national issues in the biosolids industry. During this period, existing WSSC biosolids processing facilities have...
Author(s)
Korkud EgricanLawrence H. HentzJames S. IrelandAlan WillKevin SelockKorkud Egrican
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13: Management and Economics and Competitiveness
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:2L.798;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783796628
Volume / Issue2006 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)798 - 820
Copyright2006
Word count327

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-293112
Get access
-293112
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Abstract
The Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission's (WSSC) Prince George's County Biosolids Management Facilities Plan was produced in 1994. Since then, biosolids processing and disposal practices at the WSSC have remained relatively the same, despite the developments of numerous local and national issues in the biosolids industry. During this period, existing WSSC biosolids processing facilities have aged an additional 10 years, which makes most of the major equipment more than 15 years old, and some over 40 years old. Thus, significant investments in biosolids processing facilities are likely in the near future. It is predicted that in the year 2025, on average, approximately 58 DT of biosolids will be generated every day at all three plants.This paper summarizes a portion of a study that developed and evaluated different biosolids management alternatives for the three wastewater treatment plants in Prince George's County. Four basic biosolids management technologies and three sites combined to form thirteen specific management strategies. The management strategies included a variety of stabilization and disposal methods for the biosolids generated at the wastewater treatment plants that WSSC operates in Prince George's County. One of the options evaluated was to continue the existing Class B biosolids operations and determine its implications.The stabilization technologies considered were:

lLime/Heat Stabilization
Heat Drying/Pelletization
Incineration

The management strategies combined various forms of these technologies that ranged from building and operating a regional heat drying/pelletization facility at one of the three plants that treats all the biosolids generated at all plants, to building/operating three individual lime/heat stabilization at each plant.For each of the 13 management strategies, advantages/disadvantages were identified along with a present worth analysis that included both the capital and the operation and maintenance costs.Costs per DT biosolids generated were developed for each site under each management strategy for the following cost items:

Dewatering O&M
Stabilization O&M
Transportation
Disposal
Annualized Dewatering Capital Cost
Annualized Stabilization Capital Cost
The Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission's (WSSC) Prince George's County Biosolids Management Facilities Plan was produced in 1994. Since then, biosolids processing and disposal practices at the WSSC have remained relatively the same, despite the developments of numerous local and national issues in the biosolids industry. During this period, existing WSSC biosolids processing facilities have...
Author(s)
Korkud EgricanLawrence H. HentzJames S. IrelandAlan WillKevin SelockKorkud Egrican
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13: Management and Economics and Competitiveness
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:2L.798;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783796628
Volume / Issue2006 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)798 - 820
Copyright2006
Word count327

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Korkud Egrican# Lawrence H. Hentz# James S. Ireland# Alan Will# Kevin Selock# Korkud Egrican. EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 4 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-293112CITANCHOR>.
Korkud Egrican# Lawrence H. Hentz# James S. Ireland# Alan Will# Kevin Selock# Korkud Egrican. EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 4, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293112CITANCHOR.
Korkud Egrican# Lawrence H. Hentz# James S. Ireland# Alan Will# Kevin Selock# Korkud Egrican
EVALUATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCING CLASS A BIOSOLIDS AT A REGIONAL UTILITY WITH MULTIPLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 4, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293112CITANCHOR