lastID = -294125
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 22:21:16 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:21:15 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies

Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies

Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies
Abstract
New York City's drinking water supply is threatened by the potential development of the Catskill/Delaware watershed. The effectiveness of alternative on-site wastewater treatment systems in this drinking water supply watershed is being evaluated during the course of a oneyear field study. Twenty-four on-site systems were designed and installed for individual sites throughout the Catskill/Delaware watershed. Fifteen systems utilize one of three alternative pretreatment technologies: peat filter, sand filter or aerobic treatment unit and were constructed with mounds to receive the treated wastewater. Five systems were constructed with septic tank effluent pumped to mounds while the remaining four systems are conventional systems incorporating septic tanks and leach fields installed in native soils. Samples were collected at five or six points within each treatment system monthly and analyzed for carbon, nutrients, and fecal coliform. A least squared difference (LSD) analysis was used to determine the significances of treatment at the distribution box, the point of collect after pretreatment, but before the leach field, and lysimeter 4, the deepest point of collection in the leach field. The data used in the LSD analysis of lysimeter 4 was first adjusted to remove the affects of dilution as this factor was not consistent across system types. Adjustments for dilution were made using conductivity, a conservative tracer that was collected throughout the study. The LSD analysis of the distribution box data presented evidence that pre-treatment units provide a significant amount of treatment to wastewater. Generally, sand and peat filters treat waste to the same levels, but sand filters removed phosphorus to a greater degree. Aerobic treatment units removed the greatest amounts of total nitrogen, but failed to convert a significant amount of ammonia to nitrate + nitrite. In comparison to both sand and peat filters, aerobic treatment units failed to remove significant amounts of fecal coliform. Dilution affects were found to remain fairly constant throughout raised bed leach fields. In comparison they increased with depth in traditional leach fields. As a result, conventional systems, the only system type installed with a traditional leach field, appeared to have to greatest constituent removal by lysimeter 4. After the lysimeter 4 data had been adjusted for dilution it became apparent that peat and sand systems had the greatest removal rates by lysimeter 4.
New York City's drinking water supply is threatened by the potential development of the Catskill/Delaware watershed. The effectiveness of alternative on-site wastewater treatment systems in this drinking water supply watershed is being evaluated during the course of a oneyear field study. Twenty-four on-site systems were designed and installed for individual sites throughout the Catskill/Delaware...
Author(s)
James M. HassettAlvin ChanJessica S. MartinThomas DeJohn
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 16: Onsite and Small Systems Provide Effective Treatment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20071013)2007:18L.1108;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787452723
Volume / Issue2007 / 18
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)1108 - 1120
Copyright2007
Word count381
Subject keywordsAEROBIC TREATMENT UNITON-SITE TREATMENT SYSTEMPEAT FILTERSAND FILTERSEPTIC SYSTEM

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-294125
Get access
-294125
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies
Abstract
New York City's drinking water supply is threatened by the potential development of the Catskill/Delaware watershed. The effectiveness of alternative on-site wastewater treatment systems in this drinking water supply watershed is being evaluated during the course of a oneyear field study. Twenty-four on-site systems were designed and installed for individual sites throughout the Catskill/Delaware watershed. Fifteen systems utilize one of three alternative pretreatment technologies: peat filter, sand filter or aerobic treatment unit and were constructed with mounds to receive the treated wastewater. Five systems were constructed with septic tank effluent pumped to mounds while the remaining four systems are conventional systems incorporating septic tanks and leach fields installed in native soils. Samples were collected at five or six points within each treatment system monthly and analyzed for carbon, nutrients, and fecal coliform. A least squared difference (LSD) analysis was used to determine the significances of treatment at the distribution box, the point of collect after pretreatment, but before the leach field, and lysimeter 4, the deepest point of collection in the leach field. The data used in the LSD analysis of lysimeter 4 was first adjusted to remove the affects of dilution as this factor was not consistent across system types. Adjustments for dilution were made using conductivity, a conservative tracer that was collected throughout the study. The LSD analysis of the distribution box data presented evidence that pre-treatment units provide a significant amount of treatment to wastewater. Generally, sand and peat filters treat waste to the same levels, but sand filters removed phosphorus to a greater degree. Aerobic treatment units removed the greatest amounts of total nitrogen, but failed to convert a significant amount of ammonia to nitrate + nitrite. In comparison to both sand and peat filters, aerobic treatment units failed to remove significant amounts of fecal coliform. Dilution affects were found to remain fairly constant throughout raised bed leach fields. In comparison they increased with depth in traditional leach fields. As a result, conventional systems, the only system type installed with a traditional leach field, appeared to have to greatest constituent removal by lysimeter 4. After the lysimeter 4 data had been adjusted for dilution it became apparent that peat and sand systems had the greatest removal rates by lysimeter 4.
New York City's drinking water supply is threatened by the potential development of the Catskill/Delaware watershed. The effectiveness of alternative on-site wastewater treatment systems in this drinking water supply watershed is being evaluated during the course of a oneyear field study. Twenty-four on-site systems were designed and installed for individual sites throughout the Catskill/Delaware...
Author(s)
James M. HassettAlvin ChanJessica S. MartinThomas DeJohn
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 16: Onsite and Small Systems Provide Effective Treatment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20071013)2007:18L.1108;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787452723
Volume / Issue2007 / 18
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)1108 - 1120
Copyright2007
Word count381
Subject keywordsAEROBIC TREATMENT UNITON-SITE TREATMENT SYSTEMPEAT FILTERSAND FILTERSEPTIC SYSTEM

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
James M. Hassett# Alvin Chan# Jessica S. Martin# Thomas DeJohn. Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies. Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 30 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-294125CITANCHOR>.
James M. Hassett# Alvin Chan# Jessica S. Martin# Thomas DeJohn. Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies. Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 30, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294125CITANCHOR.
James M. Hassett# Alvin Chan# Jessica S. Martin# Thomas DeJohn
Effectiveness of Alternative On-site Wastewater Treatment Technologies
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 30, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294125CITANCHOR