lastID = -294173
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 12:53:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 12:53:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:54:01 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:54:00 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater

Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater

Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater
Abstract
The present study evaluated the performance of a static granular bed reactor (SGBR) and an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor at mesophilic conditions under various hydraulic retention times (HRTs) for the treatment of paper mill wastewater. Wastewater was provided by Grand Rapids Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) in Minnesota, USA. Anaerobic seed granules were obtained from a UASB reactor at the Cedar Rapids Water Pollution Control Facility in Iowa, which treats waste water from the Cedar River Paper Company. A range of HRTs were used following a 29-day start-up period. Initial HRT conditions were 24 h prior to being decreased to 4 h. The overall chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency was higher for the SGBR than the UASB. At the 4 hour HRT, the COD removal was greater than 70% for the SGBR and 60% for the UASB. Otherwise, solids removal was higher for the UASB especially at the 9 and 6 h HRTs. Effluent volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations were lower for the SGBR at every HRT condition.
The present study evaluated the performance of a static granular bed reactor (SGBR) and an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor at mesophilic conditions under various hydraulic retention times (HRTs) for the treatment of paper mill wastewater. Wastewater was provided by Grand Rapids Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) in Minnesota, USA. Anaerobic seed granules were obtained from a UASB...
Author(s)
F. Ilter Turkdogan AydinolEric A. EvansJaeyoung ParkKristin M. EvansJay KempTimothy G. Ellis
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 1: Industrial Anaerobic Treatment Applications
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20071001)2007:19L.12;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707786831732
Volume / Issue2007 / 19
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)12 - 25
Copyright2007
Word count182
Subject keywordsANAEROBICPULP AND PAPERSGBRUASBHRTSPECIFIC COD REMOVAL

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-294173
Get access
-294173
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater
Abstract
The present study evaluated the performance of a static granular bed reactor (SGBR) and an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor at mesophilic conditions under various hydraulic retention times (HRTs) for the treatment of paper mill wastewater. Wastewater was provided by Grand Rapids Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) in Minnesota, USA. Anaerobic seed granules were obtained from a UASB reactor at the Cedar Rapids Water Pollution Control Facility in Iowa, which treats waste water from the Cedar River Paper Company. A range of HRTs were used following a 29-day start-up period. Initial HRT conditions were 24 h prior to being decreased to 4 h. The overall chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency was higher for the SGBR than the UASB. At the 4 hour HRT, the COD removal was greater than 70% for the SGBR and 60% for the UASB. Otherwise, solids removal was higher for the UASB especially at the 9 and 6 h HRTs. Effluent volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations were lower for the SGBR at every HRT condition.
The present study evaluated the performance of a static granular bed reactor (SGBR) and an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor at mesophilic conditions under various hydraulic retention times (HRTs) for the treatment of paper mill wastewater. Wastewater was provided by Grand Rapids Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) in Minnesota, USA. Anaerobic seed granules were obtained from a UASB...
Author(s)
F. Ilter Turkdogan AydinolEric A. EvansJaeyoung ParkKristin M. EvansJay KempTimothy G. Ellis
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 1: Industrial Anaerobic Treatment Applications
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20071001)2007:19L.12;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707786831732
Volume / Issue2007 / 19
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)12 - 25
Copyright2007
Word count182
Subject keywordsANAEROBICPULP AND PAPERSGBRUASBHRTSPECIFIC COD REMOVAL

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
F. Ilter Turkdogan Aydinol# Eric A. Evans# Jaeyoung Park# Kristin M. Evans# Jay Kemp# Timothy G. Ellis. Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater. Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 13 Dec. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-294173CITANCHOR>.
F. Ilter Turkdogan Aydinol# Eric A. Evans# Jaeyoung Park# Kristin M. Evans# Jay Kemp# Timothy G. Ellis. Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater. Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed December 13, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294173CITANCHOR.
F. Ilter Turkdogan Aydinol# Eric A. Evans# Jaeyoung Park# Kristin M. Evans# Jay Kemp# Timothy G. Ellis
Evaluation of SGBR and UASB Reactors to Treat Pulp and Paper Wastewater
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
December 13, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294173CITANCHOR