lastID = -295493
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 15:02:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:42:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:34:15 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:34:14 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge

Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge

Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge
Abstract
Microaerophilic sludge digestion is better suited to excess MBR sludge digestion because the long SRTs already in place during operation of MBRs. A comparison of the design parameters of aerobic and micro-aerophilic sludge digestion of MBRs is presented. When using option 4 of 503 rule for reduction of vector attraction, SOUR less than 1.5 mg O2 / g TS d, the criteria is met consistently within two days of digestion for all conditions tested in this project. For initial SOUR rates of 3 mg O2/g TS h the required digestion time is only 5 days. This is in contrast to over 35 days required for obtaining 38% reduction in VS. No significant differences were observed in the rate of SOUR reduction or the time required for achieving the target SOUR when digesting MBR sludge under aerobic or anoxic conditions. No significant effect of the initial TSS concentration was observed either. This effect is consistent with theory. It is advantageous to control the ORP of the digestion process to a level over – 200mV when using anoxic digestion. ORP values lower than this would induce significant accumulation of ammonia in the system. Ammonia has a strong effect on the determination of SOUR. Concentrations as low as 1 mg/L induce saturation of the kinetics of oxygen uptake creating a confounding factor in the SOUR determinations. It is recommended to aerate the sludge for a short aeration period of 30 minutes in order to remove trace ammonia levels and to obtain consistent results for comparison with aerobic digestion. The aerobic process exhibited higher pathogen reduction rate than the microaerophilic process. It is likely that pathogen reduction criteria might control the overall sizing of the digester if Class B sludge is desired. Combination of SOUR and pathogen reduction criteria could be optimized for different disposal scenarios.
Microaerophilic sludge digestion is better suited to excess MBR sludge digestion because the long SRTs already in place during operation of MBRs. A comparison of the design parameters of aerobic and micro-aerophilic sludge digestion of MBRs is presented. When using option 4 of 503 rule for reduction of vector attraction, SOUR less than 1.5 mg O2 / g TS d, the criteria is met consistently within...
Author(s)
Eugenio GiraldoWei ChengMark LeChevallier
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 6: Digestion Advancements and Enhancements I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:3L.348;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788807105
Volume / Issue2008 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)348 - 362
Copyright2008
Word count309

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-295493
Get access
-295493
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge
Abstract
Microaerophilic sludge digestion is better suited to excess MBR sludge digestion because the long SRTs already in place during operation of MBRs. A comparison of the design parameters of aerobic and micro-aerophilic sludge digestion of MBRs is presented. When using option 4 of 503 rule for reduction of vector attraction, SOUR less than 1.5 mg O2 / g TS d, the criteria is met consistently within two days of digestion for all conditions tested in this project. For initial SOUR rates of 3 mg O2/g TS h the required digestion time is only 5 days. This is in contrast to over 35 days required for obtaining 38% reduction in VS. No significant differences were observed in the rate of SOUR reduction or the time required for achieving the target SOUR when digesting MBR sludge under aerobic or anoxic conditions. No significant effect of the initial TSS concentration was observed either. This effect is consistent with theory. It is advantageous to control the ORP of the digestion process to a level over – 200mV when using anoxic digestion. ORP values lower than this would induce significant accumulation of ammonia in the system. Ammonia has a strong effect on the determination of SOUR. Concentrations as low as 1 mg/L induce saturation of the kinetics of oxygen uptake creating a confounding factor in the SOUR determinations. It is recommended to aerate the sludge for a short aeration period of 30 minutes in order to remove trace ammonia levels and to obtain consistent results for comparison with aerobic digestion. The aerobic process exhibited higher pathogen reduction rate than the microaerophilic process. It is likely that pathogen reduction criteria might control the overall sizing of the digester if Class B sludge is desired. Combination of SOUR and pathogen reduction criteria could be optimized for different disposal scenarios.
Microaerophilic sludge digestion is better suited to excess MBR sludge digestion because the long SRTs already in place during operation of MBRs. A comparison of the design parameters of aerobic and micro-aerophilic sludge digestion of MBRs is presented. When using option 4 of 503 rule for reduction of vector attraction, SOUR less than 1.5 mg O2 / g TS d, the criteria is met consistently within...
Author(s)
Eugenio GiraldoWei ChengMark LeChevallier
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 6: Digestion Advancements and Enhancements I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:3L.348;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788807105
Volume / Issue2008 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)348 - 362
Copyright2008
Word count309

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Eugenio Giraldo# Wei Cheng# Mark LeChevallier. Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 28 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-295493CITANCHOR>.
Eugenio Giraldo# Wei Cheng# Mark LeChevallier. Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 28, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295493CITANCHOR.
Eugenio Giraldo# Wei Cheng# Mark LeChevallier
Energy Optimization of Aerobic Digestion of MBR Sludge
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 28, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295493CITANCHOR