lastID = -296589
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 20:17:50 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 20:17:45 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:08:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:08:02 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 20:45:06 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:45:05 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin

Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin

Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin
Abstract
This paper describes the use of innovative passive hydraulic controls to mitigate SSO/CSO occurrences, to enhance hydraulic conveyance within the Clean Water Atlanta Program sewer jurisdictions, and to reduce future costs of capacity enhancement programs.The City's Consent Decree requires the capacity of the existing sewers be increased to reduce overflows and to prevent surcharge conditions during future peak flow conditions (i.e., under a 2-year, 3-hour cloud burst design storm). Even with trunk sewer rehabilitation for infiltration/inflow (I/I) reduction completed under the City's sewer system evaluation survey/ sewer rehabilitation program, implementation of capacity enhancement projects in several of the City's basins will be exorbitant, especially for projects in those basins undergoing significant growth. To create potential cost reductions, traditional hydraulic capacity expansion methods were modified to use in-system storage to trim or reduce upstream design peaks so that unacceptable surcharge and inadequate levels of sanitary sewer service in existing down stream piping systems were mitigated.Use of in-system storage will invariantly cause purposefully created surcharge upstream of the control structure, but in so doing will protect downstream areas. The tactical idea is to create short upstream pipe segments used for controlled storage (but satisfying all acceptable freeboard or level of service conditions) to eliminate long downstream segments undergoing capacity restrictions. This idea proved extremely attractive in basins where upstream areas were undergoing intensive growth and existing capacity-limited trunk sewers needed to be replaced and enlarged.Generation of in-system storage during a wet event invariably will require clog-free underflow flow throttling and rapid fail-safe weir overflow. The function of flow throttling can be generated using passive controls. A passive control throttle involves a device that automatically limits discharge under increased flow conditions or rises in water surface, regardless of system hydraulic conditions. Devices such as bending weirs, vortex throttles and Hydroslides (adjustable orifice control) were used to create in-system storage and to attenuate peak wet weather flows within existing and rehabilitated trunk systems.This alternate approach to increasing hydraulic capacity reduced potential capital expenditures and construction disturbances associated with the installation of large diameter trunk systems. For the Utoy Creek Basin, these devices were used to (1) improve the distribution of flows between two existing trunk systems that convey flows across the basin and (2) purposefully store peak wet flows along major trunk systems. Trunk sewer capacity enhancement capital expenditures were reduced by 17 million or about 31 percent of traditional approach. Long term extreme event time series imulations provided equivalent SSOs occurrences and volumes for the two different approaches.
This paper describes the use of innovative passive hydraulic controls to mitigate SSO/CSO occurrences, to enhance hydraulic conveyance within the Clean Water Atlanta Program sewer jurisdictions, and to reduce future costs of capacity enhancement programs.The City's Consent Decree requires the capacity of the existing sewers be increased to reduce overflows and to prevent surcharge conditions...
Author(s)
Bill PisanoSharon MatthewsSandy GrayElise StoneyWilliam Pisano
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 7 - EPA Region 4 Regulatory Review
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:2L.464;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793846998
Volume / Issue2009 / 2
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)464 - 479
Copyright2009
Word count427
Subject keywordsCapacity improvementshydraulic passive controlspeak flow controlinnovative solutionsSSO reduction

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-296589
Get access
-296589
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin
Abstract
This paper describes the use of innovative passive hydraulic controls to mitigate SSO/CSO occurrences, to enhance hydraulic conveyance within the Clean Water Atlanta Program sewer jurisdictions, and to reduce future costs of capacity enhancement programs.The City's Consent Decree requires the capacity of the existing sewers be increased to reduce overflows and to prevent surcharge conditions during future peak flow conditions (i.e., under a 2-year, 3-hour cloud burst design storm). Even with trunk sewer rehabilitation for infiltration/inflow (I/I) reduction completed under the City's sewer system evaluation survey/ sewer rehabilitation program, implementation of capacity enhancement projects in several of the City's basins will be exorbitant, especially for projects in those basins undergoing significant growth. To create potential cost reductions, traditional hydraulic capacity expansion methods were modified to use in-system storage to trim or reduce upstream design peaks so that unacceptable surcharge and inadequate levels of sanitary sewer service in existing down stream piping systems were mitigated.Use of in-system storage will invariantly cause purposefully created surcharge upstream of the control structure, but in so doing will protect downstream areas. The tactical idea is to create short upstream pipe segments used for controlled storage (but satisfying all acceptable freeboard or level of service conditions) to eliminate long downstream segments undergoing capacity restrictions. This idea proved extremely attractive in basins where upstream areas were undergoing intensive growth and existing capacity-limited trunk sewers needed to be replaced and enlarged.Generation of in-system storage during a wet event invariably will require clog-free underflow flow throttling and rapid fail-safe weir overflow. The function of flow throttling can be generated using passive controls. A passive control throttle involves a device that automatically limits discharge under increased flow conditions or rises in water surface, regardless of system hydraulic conditions. Devices such as bending weirs, vortex throttles and Hydroslides (adjustable orifice control) were used to create in-system storage and to attenuate peak wet weather flows within existing and rehabilitated trunk systems.This alternate approach to increasing hydraulic capacity reduced potential capital expenditures and construction disturbances associated with the installation of large diameter trunk systems. For the Utoy Creek Basin, these devices were used to (1) improve the distribution of flows between two existing trunk systems that convey flows across the basin and (2) purposefully store peak wet flows along major trunk systems. Trunk sewer capacity enhancement capital expenditures were reduced by 17 million or about 31 percent of traditional approach. Long term extreme event time series imulations provided equivalent SSOs occurrences and volumes for the two different approaches.
This paper describes the use of innovative passive hydraulic controls to mitigate SSO/CSO occurrences, to enhance hydraulic conveyance within the Clean Water Atlanta Program sewer jurisdictions, and to reduce future costs of capacity enhancement programs.The City's Consent Decree requires the capacity of the existing sewers be increased to reduce overflows and to prevent surcharge conditions...
Author(s)
Bill PisanoSharon MatthewsSandy GrayElise StoneyWilliam Pisano
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 7 - EPA Region 4 Regulatory Review
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:2L.464;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793846998
Volume / Issue2009 / 2
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)464 - 479
Copyright2009
Word count427
Subject keywordsCapacity improvementshydraulic passive controlspeak flow controlinnovative solutionsSSO reduction

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Bill Pisano# Sharon Matthews# Sandy Gray# Elise Stoney# William Pisano. Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-296589CITANCHOR>.
Bill Pisano# Sharon Matthews# Sandy Gray# Elise Stoney# William Pisano. Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296589CITANCHOR.
Bill Pisano# Sharon Matthews# Sandy Gray# Elise Stoney# William Pisano
Capital Cost Savings Using Passive Controls in Atlanta's Utoy Creek Basin
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296589CITANCHOR