lastID = -296716
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:44:42 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:44:41 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:21:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:20:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 04:55:33 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 04:55:32 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators

The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators

The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators
Abstract
The Multiple Hearth Incinerator (MHI) has been the workhorse for publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) for many years to burn dewatered solids for volume reduction. Built in the 1970s and 1980s, many of these units are undergoing upgrades to keep them running. In other cases, POTWs that currently incinerate using MHIs are faced with a decision to renew their MHIs or replace them with fluid bed incinerators (FBIs). This paper will compare the processing capacity and operational requirements for MHI and FBI incineration, and will address the environmental, social and economic viability, the triple bottom-line, for continuing to incinerate wastewater solids with renewed MHIs or replacing them with new FBIs. This paper concludes that with increased regulations applied to incineration in the future, new FBIs will better position a POTW for that future.
The Multiple Hearth Incinerator (MHI) has been the workhorse for publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) for many years to burn dewatered solids for volume reduction. Built in the 1970s and 1980s, many of these units are undergoing upgrades to keep them running. In other cases, POTWs that currently incinerate using MHIs are faced with a decision to renew their MHIs or replace them with fluid bed...
Author(s)
Frank DachilleScott ReedJames RowanJames Welp
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2 - Energy Recovery
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:3L.92;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793846899
Volume / Issue2009 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)92 - 102
Copyright2009
Word count144
Subject keywordsMultiple hearth incineratorfluidized bed incineratorincinerator modificationsincinerator replacementsustainable technology

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-296716
Get access
-296716
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators
Abstract
The Multiple Hearth Incinerator (MHI) has been the workhorse for publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) for many years to burn dewatered solids for volume reduction. Built in the 1970s and 1980s, many of these units are undergoing upgrades to keep them running. In other cases, POTWs that currently incinerate using MHIs are faced with a decision to renew their MHIs or replace them with fluid bed incinerators (FBIs). This paper will compare the processing capacity and operational requirements for MHI and FBI incineration, and will address the environmental, social and economic viability, the triple bottom-line, for continuing to incinerate wastewater solids with renewed MHIs or replacing them with new FBIs. This paper concludes that with increased regulations applied to incineration in the future, new FBIs will better position a POTW for that future.
The Multiple Hearth Incinerator (MHI) has been the workhorse for publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) for many years to burn dewatered solids for volume reduction. Built in the 1970s and 1980s, many of these units are undergoing upgrades to keep them running. In other cases, POTWs that currently incinerate using MHIs are faced with a decision to renew their MHIs or replace them with fluid bed...
Author(s)
Frank DachilleScott ReedJames RowanJames Welp
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2 - Energy Recovery
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:3L.92;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793846899
Volume / Issue2009 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)92 - 102
Copyright2009
Word count144
Subject keywordsMultiple hearth incineratorfluidized bed incineratorincinerator modificationsincinerator replacementsustainable technology

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Frank Dachille# Scott Reed# James Rowan# James Welp. The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 12 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-296716CITANCHOR>.
Frank Dachille# Scott Reed# James Rowan# James Welp. The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 12, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296716CITANCHOR.
Frank Dachille# Scott Reed# James Rowan# James Welp
The Case for Replacing Multiple Hearth Incinerators with Fluidized Bed Incinerators
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 12, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296716CITANCHOR