lastID = -298071
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-01 01:28:00 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:27:59 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE

Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE

Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE
Abstract
Historically, methanol was used to activate and dry solid phase extraction (SPE) disks but, in January of 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a modification to their 1664A method disallowing its use as a co-solvent in the determination of n-Hexane extractable materials (HEM). This decision caused a great deal of turmoil within the SPE world.A series of tests were run on influent samples from a wastewater treatment plant using liquidliquid extraction (LLE) and SPE with and without methanol as a drying agent. These test proved that, for spikes with no matrix interference, the results for LLE and SPE with methanol were comparable to those of SPE without methanol. However, when using a raw wastewater influent sample, results of SPE without methanol had over a 42 percent reduction in HEM recovery compared to samples run using LLE and SPE with methanol. Without a drying agent such as methanol, an influent sample can encapsulate the HEM within its matrix giving significantly lower recoveries during the SPE process.Upon further communication with the EPA, methanol was allowed in a restricted sense. It could be used to activate the disk and then later to break the matrix encapsulation provided that it all be sent to waste and not eluted. With the methanol back in place, both the disk activation and the matrix encapsulation problems have been solved and HEM recoveries for automated SPE are now averaging 98 percent in laboratory tests.
Historically, methanol was used to activate and dry solid phase extraction (SPE) disks but, in January of 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a modification to their 1664A method disallowing its use as a co-solvent in the determination of n-Hexane extractable materials (HEM). This decision caused a great deal of turmoil within the SPE world.A series of tests were run on...
Author(s)
David GallagherMichael Ebitson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 102: Laboratory Novel Methods and Validation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:8L.7415;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798207909
Volume / Issue2010 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)7415 - 7421
Copyright2010
Word count246
Subject keywordsEnvironmentalWaste and SludgeSolid Phase ExtractionPetroleumSample Preparation

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298071
Get access
-298071
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE
Abstract
Historically, methanol was used to activate and dry solid phase extraction (SPE) disks but, in January of 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a modification to their 1664A method disallowing its use as a co-solvent in the determination of n-Hexane extractable materials (HEM). This decision caused a great deal of turmoil within the SPE world.A series of tests were run on influent samples from a wastewater treatment plant using liquidliquid extraction (LLE) and SPE with and without methanol as a drying agent. These test proved that, for spikes with no matrix interference, the results for LLE and SPE with methanol were comparable to those of SPE without methanol. However, when using a raw wastewater influent sample, results of SPE without methanol had over a 42 percent reduction in HEM recovery compared to samples run using LLE and SPE with methanol. Without a drying agent such as methanol, an influent sample can encapsulate the HEM within its matrix giving significantly lower recoveries during the SPE process.Upon further communication with the EPA, methanol was allowed in a restricted sense. It could be used to activate the disk and then later to break the matrix encapsulation provided that it all be sent to waste and not eluted. With the methanol back in place, both the disk activation and the matrix encapsulation problems have been solved and HEM recoveries for automated SPE are now averaging 98 percent in laboratory tests.
Historically, methanol was used to activate and dry solid phase extraction (SPE) disks but, in January of 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a modification to their 1664A method disallowing its use as a co-solvent in the determination of n-Hexane extractable materials (HEM). This decision caused a great deal of turmoil within the SPE world.A series of tests were run on...
Author(s)
David GallagherMichael Ebitson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 102: Laboratory Novel Methods and Validation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:8L.7415;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798207909
Volume / Issue2010 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)7415 - 7421
Copyright2010
Word count246
Subject keywordsEnvironmentalWaste and SludgeSolid Phase ExtractionPetroleumSample Preparation

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
David Gallagher# Michael Ebitson. Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 13 May. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298071CITANCHOR>.
David Gallagher# Michael Ebitson. Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed May 13, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298071CITANCHOR.
David Gallagher# Michael Ebitson
Method Modifications for EPA Method 1664A Using Automated SPE
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
May 13, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298071CITANCHOR