lastID = -298240
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 20:02:39 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 20:02:38 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 18:49:14 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 18:49:13 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges

A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges

A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges
Abstract
The proposed work is intended to extend our process knowledge related to co-treatment of municipal primary sludge (PS) and thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) using a pilot scale sidestream anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) compared to a conventional flow-through anaerobic digester (AD) under mesophilic and psychrophilic conditions (only mesophilic phase is presented here). The membrane performance with respect to critical and sustained flux, under various total solids (TS) loadings were investigated and preliminary results indicate a 30 to 50% reduction in the critical flux when compared to reduced TS loadings with TWAS alone. The membrane cleaning strategies of using abrasion, water flush, alkali followed by acid clean were effective at recovering lost flux. A permeation relaxation mode of operation during the permeation cycle (5 minutes permeation followed by 1 minute relaxation) was implemented and found to be effective at recovering the flux decline during permeation. The resulting treated sludge or biosolids quality will be compared for the concentration of selected EDCs along with the whole sludge extracts and permeate estrogenic and androgenic response using yeast bioassay screens (YES and YAS). Preliminary results indicate that the average relative estrogenic response increases following anaerobic digestion (AD) and in the permeate of the anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR).
The proposed work is intended to extend our process knowledge related to co-treatment of municipal primary sludge (PS) and thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) using a pilot scale sidestream anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) compared to a conventional flow-through anaerobic digester (AD) under mesophilic and psychrophilic conditions (only mesophilic phase is presented here). The membrane...
Author(s)
Vince PileggiXia ChenMartha DagnewWayne ParkerPeter Seto
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 87: Bugs, Bugs, and Fewer Bugs
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:10L.5708;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802766173
Volume / Issue2011 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)5708 - 5715
Copyright2011
Word count218

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298240
Get access
-298240
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges
Abstract
The proposed work is intended to extend our process knowledge related to co-treatment of municipal primary sludge (PS) and thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) using a pilot scale sidestream anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) compared to a conventional flow-through anaerobic digester (AD) under mesophilic and psychrophilic conditions (only mesophilic phase is presented here). The membrane performance with respect to critical and sustained flux, under various total solids (TS) loadings were investigated and preliminary results indicate a 30 to 50% reduction in the critical flux when compared to reduced TS loadings with TWAS alone. The membrane cleaning strategies of using abrasion, water flush, alkali followed by acid clean were effective at recovering lost flux. A permeation relaxation mode of operation during the permeation cycle (5 minutes permeation followed by 1 minute relaxation) was implemented and found to be effective at recovering the flux decline during permeation. The resulting treated sludge or biosolids quality will be compared for the concentration of selected EDCs along with the whole sludge extracts and permeate estrogenic and androgenic response using yeast bioassay screens (YES and YAS). Preliminary results indicate that the average relative estrogenic response increases following anaerobic digestion (AD) and in the permeate of the anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR).
The proposed work is intended to extend our process knowledge related to co-treatment of municipal primary sludge (PS) and thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) using a pilot scale sidestream anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) compared to a conventional flow-through anaerobic digester (AD) under mesophilic and psychrophilic conditions (only mesophilic phase is presented here). The membrane...
Author(s)
Vince PileggiXia ChenMartha DagnewWayne ParkerPeter Seto
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 87: Bugs, Bugs, and Fewer Bugs
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:10L.5708;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802766173
Volume / Issue2011 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)5708 - 5715
Copyright2011
Word count218

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Vince Pileggi# Xia Chen# Martha Dagnew# Wayne Parker# Peter Seto. A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 24 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298240CITANCHOR>.
Vince Pileggi# Xia Chen# Martha Dagnew# Wayne Parker# Peter Seto. A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 24, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298240CITANCHOR.
Vince Pileggi# Xia Chen# Martha Dagnew# Wayne Parker# Peter Seto
A Comparison of Treatment, Chemistry and in-Vitro Bioassay Responses During the Digestion of Combined Sludges
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 24, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298240CITANCHOR