lastID = -298797
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 14:51:55 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 23:01:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 23:01:20 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 20:51:04 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:51:03 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?

Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?

Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?
Abstract
The USEPA released their latest national guidance for development of copper aquatic life criteria in 2007. These freshwater criteria are derived using the Biotic Ligand Model (BLM) as a replacement for the hardness-based criteria equations currently used in water quality standards by almost all states. The BLM is a computational model that incorporates chemical reaction equations with the binding of metals to organism tissues responsible for causing toxicity (termed the “biotic ligand”, such as a fish gill) to better represent the complex chemical factors that influence copper bioavailability. The BLM generates instantaneous freshwater criteria (acute and chronic) using 10 water quality input parameters: temperature, pH, and concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, sulfate, chloride, and alkalinity. The BLM represents a significant scientific advancement that derives more accurate criteria which are much less likely to be significantly over- or under-protective of aquatic life. BLMs have also been developed for several other metals (e.g., nickel, zinc, and silver); these models will likely form the basis of criteria for metals other than copper in the future. However, only one state has formally adopted the BLM for use in setting water quality standards; a few other states have adopted the BLM as a tool for generating site-specific standards. We will explore the scientific and regulatory challenges that may be forming barriers to adopting BLM-based copper criteria. Scientific challenges include the potentially limited availability of data for all of the BLM parameters and variability in BLM parameter concentrations over time. This temporal variability in water quality is not unique to BLM parameters, but 10 parameters vary in more complex ways compared to hardness. Thus, successful implementation will ultimately require decisions to be made as to the number and location of water quality samples needed to adequately characterize a particular water body. Regulatory challenges include educating stakeholders on the basis of BLM-based criteria, the need for further development and review of implementation guidelines, and addressing developing concerns over the protection of salmonid fishes from copper-induced olfactory impairment. We conclude that these challenges can be met and recommend that states move toward implementation of BLM-based criteria to improve the accuracy of aquatic life protection from copper, thereby minimizing unnecessary 303(d) listings and the need for Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) where copper impairment is unlikely.
The USEPA released their latest national guidance for development of copper aquatic life criteria in 2007. These freshwater criteria are derived using the Biotic Ligand Model (BLM) as a replacement for the hardness-based criteria equations currently used in water quality standards by almost all states. The BLM is a computational model that incorporates chemical reaction equations with the binding...
Author(s)
R.W. GensemerS.D. BakerS.P. CantonJ.W. Gorsuch
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: Standards and Criteria Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:2L.542;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802864787
Volume / Issue2011 / 2
Content sourceImpaired Waters Symposium
First / last page(s)542 - 553
Copyright2011
Word count401
Subject keywordsBiotic Ligand ModelBLMCopperwater quality criteriaEPA

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298797
Get access
-298797
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?
Abstract
The USEPA released their latest national guidance for development of copper aquatic life criteria in 2007. These freshwater criteria are derived using the Biotic Ligand Model (BLM) as a replacement for the hardness-based criteria equations currently used in water quality standards by almost all states. The BLM is a computational model that incorporates chemical reaction equations with the binding of metals to organism tissues responsible for causing toxicity (termed the “biotic ligand”, such as a fish gill) to better represent the complex chemical factors that influence copper bioavailability. The BLM generates instantaneous freshwater criteria (acute and chronic) using 10 water quality input parameters: temperature, pH, and concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, sulfate, chloride, and alkalinity. The BLM represents a significant scientific advancement that derives more accurate criteria which are much less likely to be significantly over- or under-protective of aquatic life. BLMs have also been developed for several other metals (e.g., nickel, zinc, and silver); these models will likely form the basis of criteria for metals other than copper in the future. However, only one state has formally adopted the BLM for use in setting water quality standards; a few other states have adopted the BLM as a tool for generating site-specific standards. We will explore the scientific and regulatory challenges that may be forming barriers to adopting BLM-based copper criteria. Scientific challenges include the potentially limited availability of data for all of the BLM parameters and variability in BLM parameter concentrations over time. This temporal variability in water quality is not unique to BLM parameters, but 10 parameters vary in more complex ways compared to hardness. Thus, successful implementation will ultimately require decisions to be made as to the number and location of water quality samples needed to adequately characterize a particular water body. Regulatory challenges include educating stakeholders on the basis of BLM-based criteria, the need for further development and review of implementation guidelines, and addressing developing concerns over the protection of salmonid fishes from copper-induced olfactory impairment. We conclude that these challenges can be met and recommend that states move toward implementation of BLM-based criteria to improve the accuracy of aquatic life protection from copper, thereby minimizing unnecessary 303(d) listings and the need for Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) where copper impairment is unlikely.
The USEPA released their latest national guidance for development of copper aquatic life criteria in 2007. These freshwater criteria are derived using the Biotic Ligand Model (BLM) as a replacement for the hardness-based criteria equations currently used in water quality standards by almost all states. The BLM is a computational model that incorporates chemical reaction equations with the binding...
Author(s)
R.W. GensemerS.D. BakerS.P. CantonJ.W. Gorsuch
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: Standards and Criteria Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:2L.542;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802864787
Volume / Issue2011 / 2
Content sourceImpaired Waters Symposium
First / last page(s)542 - 553
Copyright2011
Word count401
Subject keywordsBiotic Ligand ModelBLMCopperwater quality criteriaEPA

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
R.W. Gensemer# S.D. Baker# S.P. Canton# J.W. Gorsuch. Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 22 Aug. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298797CITANCHOR>.
R.W. Gensemer# S.D. Baker# S.P. Canton# J.W. Gorsuch. Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed August 22, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298797CITANCHOR.
R.W. Gensemer# S.D. Baker# S.P. Canton# J.W. Gorsuch
Challenges for Implementation of Copper Aquatic Life Criteria Using the Biotic Ligand Model: What are We Waiting For?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
August 22, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298797CITANCHOR